Retrospective baseline measurement of self-reported health status and health-related quality of life versus population norms in the evaluation of post-injury losses
- 12 February 2007
- journal article
- research article
- Published by BMJ in Injury Prevention
- Vol. 13 (1) , 45-50
- https://doi.org/10.1136/ip.2005.010157
Abstract
Background: Owing to the difficulty in prospectively measuring pre-injury health status and health-related quality of life (HRQL) in an injured cohort, population norms or retrospective baseline scores are often used as comparators for evaluating post-injury losses. However, there has been little discussion in the literature or research into the soundness of these approaches for this purpose. Objectives: To investigate the appropriateness of the retrospectively measured baseline health status and HRQL in an injured population for the purpose of evaluating post-injury losses. Methods: A cohort of injured admitted to hospital (n = 186) was followed up for 12 months after injury. Retrospectively measured pre-injury health status and HRQL scores were compared with those at 12 months after injury for participants who reported complete recovery (n = 61) and those who did not. Retrospective baseline scores for the whole cohort were also compared with Australian population norms. Results: For participants who completely recovered, no significant difference was observed between scores at baseline (measured retrospectively) and those at 12 months after injury (36-item Short Form Questionnaire physical component summary z = −1.274, p = 0.203; 36-item Short Form Questionnaire mental component summary z = −1.634, p = 0.102; Short Form 6 Dimensions: z = −1.405, p = 0.296). A borderline significant difference was observed in HRQL as measured by the Assessment of Quality of Life (z = −1.970, p = 0.049). Retrospectively measured pre-injury scores were consistently higher than Australian norms for all measures. Conclusions: The injured population may not be representative of the general population. Consequently, retrospective baseline measurement of pre-injury health states may be more appropriate than general population norms for the purpose of evaluating post-injury losses in this population.Keywords
This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- Differences in prevalence of pre-existing morbidity between injured and non-injured populations.2005
- Population norms and meaningful differences for the Assessment of Quality of Life (AQoL) measureAustralian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, 2005
- Physical and Psychological Outcomes 8 Months after Serious Gunshot InjuryPublished by Wolters Kluwer Health ,2002
- Comparing Measures of Injury Severity for Use with Large DatabasesPublished by Wolters Kluwer Health ,2002
- Utility of retrospective pretest ratings of patient satisfaction with health status§Research in Nursing & Health, 2002
- The estimation of a preference-based measure of health from the SF-36Published by Elsevier ,2001
- A comparison of the Assessment of Quality of Life (AQoL) with four other generic utility instrumentsAnnals of Medicine, 2001
- Validation Study of Retrospective Recall of Disease-Targeted FunctionMedical Care, 2000
- Outcomes after hip or knee replacement surgery for osteoarthritis. A prospective cohort study comparing patients' quality of life before and after surgery with age-related population norms.1999
- The Assessment of Quality of Life (AQoL) instrument: a psychometric measure of Health-Related Quality of LifeQuality of Life Research, 1999