Borrowing Costs and the Demand for Equity Over the Life Cycle
Preprint
- 1 January 2003
- preprint
- Published by Elsevier in SSRN Electronic Journal
- Vol. 88 (2)
- https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.483582
Abstract
We analyze consumption and portfolio behavior in a life-cycle model with realistic borrowing costs and income processes. We show that even a small wedge between borrowing costs and the risk-free return dramatically shrinks the demand for equity. When the cost of borrowing equals or exceeds the expected return on equity - the relevant case according to the data - households hold little or no equity during much of the life cycle. The model also implies that the correlation between consumption growth and equity returns is low at all ages, and that risk aversion estimates based on the standard excess return formulation of the consumption Euler Equation are greatly upward biased. The demand for equity in the model is non-monotonic in borrowing costs and risk aversion, and the standard deviation of marginal utility growth is an order of magnitude smaller than the Sharpe ratio.Keywords
This publication has 35 references indexed in Scilit:
- Portfolio Choice in the Presence of HousingThe Review of Financial Studies, 2004
- Stockholding in EuropePublished by Springer Nature ,2003
- Asset Holding and Consumption VolatilityJournal of Political Economy, 2002
- Competitive Equilibria with Asymmetric InformationJournal of Economic Theory, 1999
- Chapter 19 Asset prices, consumption, and the business cyclePublished by Elsevier ,1999
- A Monetary Explanation of the Equity Premium, Term Premium, and Risk-Free Rate PuzzlesJournal of Political Economy, 1996
- Labor supply flexibility and portfolio choice in a life cycle modelJournal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 1992
- Asset returns with transactions costs and uninsured individual riskJournal of Monetary Economics, 1991
- The Timing of Intergenerational Transfers, Tax Policy, and Aggregate SavingsPublished by National Bureau of Economic Research ,1991
- Capital Market Equilibrium with Divergent Borrowing and Lending RatesJournal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 1971