A meta‐analysis on the comparative effectiveness of devil's advocacy and dialectical inquiry
- 1 May 1989
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Strategic Management Journal
- Vol. 10 (3) , 303-306
- https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250100309
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- SHARED INFLUENCE AND ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR: A META-ANALYSIS OF SITUATIONAL VARIABLES EXPECTED TO MODERATE PARTICIPATION-OUTCOME RELATIONSHIPS.The Academy of Management Journal, 1987
- PARTICIPATION, SATISFACTION, AND PRODUCTIVITY: A META-ANALYTIC REVIEW.The Academy of Management Journal, 1986
- Meta-analysis of facial identification studies.Psychological Bulletin, 1986
- DEVIL'S ADVOCACY AND DIALECTICAL INQUIRY EFFECTS ON PREDICTION PERFORMANCE: TASK INVOLVEMENT AS A MEDIATING VARIABLEDecision Sciences, 1984
- The comparative effectiveness of dialectical inquiry and Devil's advocacy: The impact of task biases on previous research findingsStrategic Management Journal, 1984
- DEVIL'S ADVOCACY IN MANAGERIAL DECISION‐MAKINGJournal of Management Studies, 1984
- Published by Wiley ,1982
- Effects of the expert, devil's advocate, and dialectical inquiry methods on prediction performanceOrganizational Behavior and Human Performance, 1980
- INQUIRY METHOD, GOAL DIFFICULTY, AND CONTEXT EFFECTS ON PERFORMANCEDecision Sciences, 1980
- The effects of three potential aids for making strategic decisions on prediction accuracyOrganizational Behavior and Human Performance, 1978