Comment on Signell and Holdeman's $I = 0$ $np$ Phase-Shift Solutions at 330 MeV

Publisher Website

6 October 1975

journal article
research article
Published by American Physical Society (APS) in Physical Review Letters

Vol. 35 (14) , 967-970
https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.35.967

Abstract

I point out that one of the two solutions that Signell and Holdeman published for

I = 0

np

scattering at 330 MeV contradicts long-range one-pion-exchange dominance. This has interesting consequences, because recent theories of

2 π

exchange strongly favor this solution in the

{}^{3}D_{1}

state.

Keywords

This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:

Ambiguity in the Nucleon-Nucleon Phase Parameters near 330 MeV
Physical Review Letters, 1971
Determination of the Nucleon-Nucleon Scattering Matrix. X. ( $p, p$ ) and ( $n, p$ ) Analysis from 1 to 450 MeV
Physical Review B, 1969
Determination of the Nucleon-Nucleon Scattering Matrix. IX. ( $n, p$ ) Analysis from 7 to 750 MeV
Physical Review B, 1968
A nucleon-nucleon potential consistent with experiment and the boson exchange theory of nuclear forces
Annals of Physics, 1968
Phase-Parameter Representation of Neutron-Proton Scattering from 13.7 to 350 MeV. II
Physical Review B, 1962
A potential model representation of two-nucleon data below 315 MeV
Nuclear Physics, 1962
Note on a Nucleon-Nucleon Potential
Physical Review B, 1962
Quantitative Evidence of One-Pion Exchange Effects in $p - p$ Scattering
Physical Review Letters, 1960
Modified Analysis of Nucleon-Nucleon Scattering. I. Theory and $p - p$ Scattering at 310 Mev
Physical Review B, 1959
On the Method of the Theory of Nuclear Forces
Progress of Theoretical Physics, 1951