VA QUERI Informatics Paper: Information Technology for Clinical Guideline Implementation: Perceptions of Multidisciplinary Stakeholders
Open Access
- 18 October 2004
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
- Vol. 12 (1) , 64-71
- https://doi.org/10.1197/jamia.M1495
Abstract
Objective: This multisite study compared the perceptions of three stakeholder groups regarding information technologies as barriers to and facilitators of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs). Design: The study settings were 18 U.S. Veterans Affairs Medical Centers. A purposive sample of 322 individuals participated in 50 focus groups segmented by profession and included administrators, physicians, and nurses. Focus group participants were selected based on their knowledge of practice guidelines and involvement in facility-wide guideline implementation. Measurements: Descriptive content analysis of 1,500 pages of focus group transcripts. Results: Eighteen themes clustered into four domains. Stakeholders were similar in discussing themes in the computer function domain most frequently but divergent in other domains, with workplace factors more often discussed by administrators, system design issues discussed most by nurses, and personal concerns discussed by physicians and nurses. Physicians and nurses most often discussed barriers, whereas administrators focused most often on facilitation. Facilitators included guideline maintenance and charting formats. Barriers included resources, attitudes, time and workload, computer glitches, computer complaints, data retrieval, and order entry. Themes with dual designations included documentation, patient records, decision support, performance evaluation, CPG implementation, computer literacy, essential data, and computer accessibility. Conclusion: Stakeholders share many concerns regarding the relationships between information technologies and clinical guideline use. However, administrators, physicians, and nurses hold different opinions about specific facilitators and barriers. Health professionals' disparate perceptions could undermine guideline initiatives. Implementation plans should specifically incorporate actions to address these barriers and enhance the facilitative aspects of information technologies in clinical practice guideline use.Keywords
This publication has 30 references indexed in Scilit:
- Closing The Gap Between Science And Practice: The Need For Professional LeadershipHealth Affairs, 2003
- The Leapfrog Standards: Ready To Jump From Marketplace To Courtroom?Health Affairs, 2003
- Benchmarking Veterans Affairs Medical Centers in the Delivery of Preventive Health ServicesMedical Care, 2002
- Controlled Trial of Direct Physician Order Entry: Effects on Physicians' Time Utilization in Ambulatory Primary Care Internal Medicine PracticesJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 2001
- Current Computer Use by Diabetes EducatorsThe Diabetes Educator, 2001
- Implementation of Clinical Guidelines via a Computer Charting System: Effect on the Care of Febrile Children Less than Three Years of AgeJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 2000
- A comparative study of the attitudes of users and non‐users towards computerized care planningJournal of Clinical Nursing, 1999
- Implementation of Physician Order Entry: User Satisfaction and Self-Reported usage PatternsJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 1996
- Changes in Physicians' Computer Anxiety and Attitudes Related to Clinical Information System UseJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 1994
- An Assessment of Computer Use, Knowledge, and Attitudes of Diabetes EducatorsThe Diabetes Educator, 1992