A Critical Analysis of the Behavioral Adaptation Explanation of the Probing Effect
- 1 June 1996
- journal article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Human Communication Research
- Vol. 22 (4) , 575-588
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1996.tb00380.x
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- Interpersonal deception: V. Accuracy in deception detectionCommunication Monographs, 1994
- Individual Differences and Changes in Nonverbal BehaviorCommunication Research, 1994
- Training Lie Detectors to Use Nonverbal Cues Instead of Global HeuristicsHuman Communication Research, 1993
- Communication failure and plan adaptation: If at first you don't succeed, say it louder and slowerCommunication Monographs, 1993
- Communication—Embrace the Subject, not the FieldJournal of Communication, 1993
- Interpersonal deception: II. The inferiority of conversational participants as deception detectorsCommunication Monographs, 1991
- Interpersonal deception: I. Deceivers’ reactions to receivers’ suspicions and probingCommunication Monographs, 1991
- Verbal and nonverbal cues as mediators of deception abilityJournal of Nonverbal Behavior, 1987
- "COME TO THINK OF IT?".Human Communication Research, 1986
- Individual differences and cues to deception.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1983