Comparative neurotoxicity of angiographic contrast media
- 1 September 1985
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Neurology
- Vol. 35 (9) , 1290
- https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.35.9.1290
Abstract
The neurotoxic effects in cerebral angiography of three iodinated ionic contrast media, nonionic iopamidol, 25% mannitol, and saline controls were compared in 25 rabbits. Diatrizoate sodium meglumine was the most toxic agent, followed by diatrizoate meglumine, iothalamate meglumine, and mannitol in terms of blood-brain barrier (BBB) disruption and coupled perfusion decline. HIPDm distribution was more sensitive than trypan blue extravasation for monitoring brain dysfunction. Iopamidol and saline controls exhibited no visual BBB breakdown or alteration in regional uptake of 1–125 HIPDm, confirming the safety of nonionic iopamidol as compared with presently used ionic contrast media.This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- QUANTIFYING LOCAL CEREBRAL BLOOD-FLOW BY N-ISOPROPYL-P-(I-123)IODOAMPHETAMINE (IMP) TOMOGRAPHY1982
- A time study in rat on the opening and reclosure of the blood-brain barrier after hypertensive or hypertonic insultExperimental Neurology, 1980
- Osmolality of intravascular radiological contrast mediaThe British Journal of Radiology, 1980
- Cerebrovasculature permeability changes following experimental cerebral angiographyJournal of the Neurological Sciences, 1976
- Intravascular agglutination of the flowing blood following the injection of radiopaque contrast mediaNeurology, 1962
- Blood pressure and heart rate responses in carotid angiography with sodium acetrizoate (Triurol)Acta Radiologica, 1958