Essential role for endothelin ETB receptors in fever induced by LPS (E. coli) in rats

Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
The influence of endothelin receptor antagonists on febrile responses to E. coli lipopolysaccharide (LPS), interleukin‐1β (IL‐1β), tumour necrosis factor‐α (TNF‐α) and endothelin‐1 (ET‐1) was assessed in conscious rats. Intravenous (i.v.) LPS (5.0 μg kg−1) markedly increased rectal temperature to a peak of 1.30°C over baseline at 2.5 h. Pretreatment with the mixed endothelin ETA/ETB receptor antagonist bosentan (10 mg kg−1, i.v.) or the selective endothelin ETB receptor antagonist BQ‐788 (N‐cis‐2,6‐dimethyl‐piperidinocarbonyl‐L‐γ‐methylleucyl‐D‐1‐methoxycarboyl‐D‐norleucine; 3 pmol, into a lateral cerebral ventricle–i.c.v.) reduced the peak response to LPS to 0.90 and 0.75°C, respectively. The selective endothelin ETA receptor antagonist BQ‐123 (cyclo[D‐Trp‐D‐Asp‐Pro‐D‐Val‐Leu]; 3 pmol, i.c.v.) was ineffective. Increases in temperature caused by IL‐1β (180 fmol, i.c.v.), TNF‐α (14.4 pmol, i.c.v.) or IL‐1β (150 pmol kg−1, i.v.) were unaffected by BQ‐788 (3 pmol, i.c.v.). Central injection of endothelin‐1 (0.1 to 3 fmol, i.c.v.) caused slowly‐developing and long‐lasting increases in rectal temperature (starting 2 h after administration and peaking at 4–6 h between 0.90 and 1.15°C) which were not clearly dose‐dependent. The response to endothelin‐1 (1 fmol, i.c.v.) was prevented by BQ‐788, but not by BQ‐123 (each at 3 pmol, i.c.v.). Intraperitoneal pretreatment with the cyclo‐oxygenase inhibitor indomethacin (2 mg kg−1), which partially reduced LPS‐induced fever, did not modify the hyperthermic response to endothelin‐1 (3 fmol, i.c.v.). Therefore, central endothelin(s) participates importantly in the development of LPS‐induced fever, via activation of a prostanoid‐independent endothelin ETB receptor‐mediated mechanism possibly not situated downstream from IL‐1β or TNF‐α in the fever cascade. British Journal of Pharmacology (1998) 125, 542–548; doi:10.1038/sj.bjp.0702075