Evaluation of two methods for assessing gene‐environment interactions using data from the Danish case‐control study of facial clefts
- 17 June 2005
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Birth Defects Research Part A: Clinical and Molecular Teratology
- Vol. 73 (8) , 541-546
- https://doi.org/10.1002/bdra.20167
Abstract
BACKGROUND Epidemiological investigations have begun to consider gene‐environment (GE) interactions as potential risk factors for many diseases, including several different birth defects. However, traditional methodological approaches for the analysis of case‐control data tend to have low power for detection of interaction effects. A log‐linear approach that can impose the assumption that the genotype and exposure of interest occur independently in the population has been proposed as a potentially more powerful method for assessing GE interactions but has not been widely applied in the published literature. METHODS The present analyses were undertaken to compare the results obtained when stratified analyses and a log‐linear approach were used to assess potential GE interactions. The analyses were conducted using data from a population‐based, case‐control study conducted in Denmark and considered associations between nonsyndromic cleft lip with or without cleft palate (CL±P), infant genotype for variants of RAR‐α, TGF‐α, TGF‐β3, and MSX1, and maternal exposure to smoking, alcohol, and multivitamins. RESULTS Neither the stratified nor the log‐linear analyses provided evidence that that risk of CL±P is influenced by any of the GE interactions that were evaluated, despite the potential increase in power offered by the latter approach. Further, the analyses highlight concerns regarding the power to reject the assumption of independence of the genetic and environmental factor of interest in the controls and related concerns regarding the validity of results obtained using the log‐linear approach when the underlying assumption is violated. CONCLUSIONS The potential increase in power offered by the log‐linear approach is offset by concerns regarding the validity of this approach when the independence assumption is violated. Birth Defects Research (Part A), 2005.Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Cleft palate, transforming growth factor alpha gene variants, and maternal exposures: Assessing gene‐environment interactions in case‐parent triadsGenetic Epidemiology, 2003
- Retinoic Acid Receptor Alpha Gene Variants, Multivitamin Use, and Liver Intake as Risk Factors for Oral Clefts: A Population-based Case-Control Study in Denmark, 1991-1994American Journal of Epidemiology, 2003
- Controlling the false discovery rate in behavior genetics researchBehavioural Brain Research, 2001
- Limitations of the Case-only Design for Identifying Gene-Environment InteractionsAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 2001
- Evaluation of Two Putative Susceptibility Loci for Oral Clefts in the Danish PopulationAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 2001
- THE AUTHORS REPLYAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 1999
- RE: "MATERIAL VITAMIN USE, GENETIC VARIATION OF INFANT METHYLENETETRAHYDROFOLATE REDUCTASE, AND RISK FOR SPINA BIFIDA"American Journal of Epidemiology, 1999
- COMMENTARY: Power and Sample Size Calculations in Case-Control Studies of Gene-Environment Interactions: Comments on Different ApproachesAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 1999
- Maternal Vitamin Use, Genetic Variation of Infant Methylenetetrahydrofolate Reducatase, and Risk for spina BifidaAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 1998
- Non‐hierarchical logistic models and case‐only designs for assessing susceptibility in population‐based case‐control studiesStatistics in Medicine, 1994