Normal fluctuation of physiologic cardiovascular variables during anesthesia and the phenomenon of “smoothing”
- 1 April 1991
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing
- Vol. 7 (2) , 141-145
- https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01618113
Abstract
With the advent of automated anesthesia record keeping devices, concern has arisen that “abnormal” values will appear in the record and possibly lead to medicolegal compromise. A retrospective review of automated records from a series of anesthesia cases was undertaken to determine if abnormal values do occur, how frequent they are, and whether they cause problems. A total of 14,826 (4,942 each) noninvasive heart rate, systolic, and diastolic blood pressure readings from 118 case printouts generated by a Diatek Arkive Patient Information Management System (63 cases) or a Data-scope Datatrac record keeper (55 cases) were recorded. The study sample covered a broad range of surgical operations, anesthetic procedures, and patient ages and medical histories. During these 118 anesthetics, the majority of readings of all three variables fell within normal ranges (defined for this study as 80 to 180 and 50 to 110 mm Hg for systolic and diastolic blood pressures, respectively, and 60 to 140 beats/min for heart rate). During the anesthetics, 3.6% of the systolic pressure readings, 13.25% of the diastolic readings, and 4.25% of the heart rate readings were recorded outside these ranges. No serious intraoperative or postoperative anesthesia complications were associated with these out-of-range readings, nor would they be expected in a sample of this size, since serious anesthetic complications are rare. This preliminary observation of one person's experience may help address the concern associated with allowing high and low blood pressure and heart rate readings to be automatically recorded “unsmoothed.” In medicolegal situations, it should also begin to demonstrate that such fluctuations are neither uncommon nor abnormal, and that a true record of these readings should be neither a cause for concern nor an opportunity for medicolegal exploitation.Keywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- IntroductionJournal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing, 1989
- Differences Between Handwritten and Automatic Blood Pressure RecordsAnesthesiology, 1989
- COMPARISON OF NON-INVASIVE BLOOD PRESSURE MEASUREMENTS ON THE ARM AND THE ANKLEAnesthesiology, 1989
- Automated charting of physiological variables in anesthesia: A quantitative comparison of automated versus handwritten anesthesia recordsJournal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing, 1988
- The automated anesthesia recordJournal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing, 1986
- Computerized Anesthesia Records May Be DangerousAnesthesiology, 1986
- Diurnal Variation of Blood Pressure in Elderly Patients with Essential HypertensionJournal of the American Geriatrics Society, 1984
- The effects of beta-blocker therapy on diurnal variation of blood pressureEuropean Heart Journal, 1983
- Automated Blood Pressure Recording: The Phenomenon of Blood Pressure Elevations During SpeechAngiology, 1982
- Man-made versus computer-generated anesthesia recordsJournal of Surgical Research, 1977