A Method of Comparison for Standardized Rates of Low-Incidence Events
- 1 January 1997
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Medical Care
- Vol. 35 (1) , 57-69
- https://doi.org/10.1097/00005650-199701000-00005
Abstract
The authors present an approximate but simple approach to comparing age-gender standardized rates of low-incidence events (mortality or morbidity) rates across several geographic areas. The presented method will be useful particularly when a person-level database, one that includes unique person identifiers, is not available. We specify conditions under which comparisons can be made without calculating empirical standard errors and worrying unduly about recurrent events. To compare indirectly standardized rates, only information on the size, the crude rate, and the standardized rate of the areas are needed. For comparing directly standardized rates, which requires stratum-specific rates, the method also requires stratum-specific total numbers of events and individuals but does not require person-level information. The proposed approach builds on previous work comparing rates using person-level data.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Comparing Standardized Rates of EventsAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 1994
- Small Area Variation AnalysisMedical Care, 1993
- Estimating the Variance of Standardized Rates of Recurrent Events, with Application to Hospitalizations among the Elderly in New EnglandAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 1993
- INFORMED INQUIRY INTO PRACTICE VARIATIONS: THE MAINE MEDICAL ASSESSMENT FOUNDATIONInternational Journal for Quality in Health Care, 1990
- Variation in Hospital Admissions Among Small Areas: A Comparison of Maine and MichiganMedical Care, 1989
- Dealing With Medical Practice Variations: A Proposal for ActionHealth Affairs, 1984
- Small-Area Variations in the Use of Common Surgical Procedures: An International Comparison of New England, England, and NorwayNew England Journal of Medicine, 1982
- A SHORTCUT METHOD FOR CALCULATING THE 95 PER CENT CONFIDENCE INTERVAL OF THE STANDARDIZED MORTALITY RATIOAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 1982