Individual Differences in Anagram-Solving Ability
- 1 December 1966
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Psychological Reports
- Vol. 19 (3) , 799-809
- https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1966.19.3.799
Abstract
Anagram solution was, as expected, significantly correlated with level of vocabulary ( r = .29), but, while high anagram scores are associated with high vocabulary, low anagram scores are as often associated with high as with low vocabulary. MMPI measures of Anxiety and Repression were unrelated to anagram solution. In a second study, as predicted, Mednick's RAT, the Gottschaldt Figures Test and an incidental recall measure were significantly correlated with anagram solution ( r = .43, .40, and .31, respectively, multiple R = .55), but the Stroop test, an incidental recognition measure and digit span measures were not. Two factors apparently underlie anagram solving ability—an adequate level of familiarity with words and the ability to shift attention in a directed but flexible manner.Keywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Differential use of incidental stimuli in problem solving as a function of creativity.The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1964
- Field dependence and overcoming embeddedness.Journal of Consulting Psychology, 1963
- The associative basis of the creative process.Psychological Review, 1962
- Time-Pattern of Switching Among Alternatives in Problem SolvingPsychological Reports, 1961
- FURTHER STUDIES ON ANAGRAM SOLVINGBritish Journal of Psychology, 1961
- A Standard Anagram TaskPsychological Reports, 1959
- THE SOLVING OF FIVE‐LETTER ANAGRAM PROBLEMSBritish Journal of Psychology, 1959
- Anagram solution times: A function of letter order and word frequency.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1958
- Perceptual Performance And The Effective PersonPublished by American Psychological Association (APA) ,1958
- The effects of single and compound classes of anagrams on set solutions.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1953