Robust Techniques for Testing Heterogeneity of Variance Effects in Factorial Designs
- 1 September 1978
- journal article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Psychometrika
- Vol. 43 (3) , 327-342
- https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02293643
Abstract
Several ways of using the traditional analysis of variance to test heterogeneity of spread in factorial designs with equal or unequal n are compared using both theoretical and Monte Carlo results. Two types of spread variables, (1) the jackknife pseudovalues of s2 and (2) the absolute deviations from the cell median, are shown to be robust and relatively powerful. These variables seem to be generally superior to the Z-variance and Box-Scheffé procedures.Keywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Comment on Levy’s “An Empirical Comparison of the Z-variance and Box-Scheffé Tests for Homogeneity of Variance”Psychometrika, 1976
- An Empirical Comparison of the Z-Variance and Box-Scheffé Tests for Homogeneity of VariancePsychometrika, 1975
- Robust Tests for the Equality of VariancesJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1974
- Some problems in the nonorthogonal analysis of variance.Psychological Bulletin, 1974
- Robust Large-Sample Tests for Homogeneity of VariancesJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1973
- Robust Tests for Homogeneity of VarianceEducational and Psychological Measurement, 1972
- Consequences of Failure to Meet Assumptions Underlying the Fixed Effects Analyses of Variance and CovarianceReview of Educational Research, 1972
- A Study of Methods for Comparing Several VariancesJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1972
- One-line random number generators and their use in combinationsCommunications of the ACM, 1968
- Jackknifing VariancesThe Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 1968