Optimization of prostate carcinoma staging: Comparison of imaging and clinical methods
- 1 September 1995
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier in Clinical Radiology
- Vol. 50 (9) , 593-600
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0009-9260(05)83287-8
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- Evaluation of localised prostate cancer: a comparative study of transrectal ultrasonography versus histopathologyEuropean Radiology, 1993
- Evaluation of the prostate and prostatic carcinoma with gadolinium-enhanced endorectal coil MR imaging.Radiology, 1993
- Comparison of the digital rectal examination, endorectal ultrasound, and body coil magnetic resonance imaging in the staging of adenocarcinoma of the prostateUrologic Radiology, 1991
- Comparison of Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Ultrasonography in Staging Early Prostate CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 1990
- Prostate: MR imaging with an endorectal surface coil.Radiology, 1989
- The Value of the Measurement of Serum Prostate Specific Antigen in Patients with Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia and Untreated Prostate CancerBritish Journal of Urology, 1988
- Inflatable surface coil for MR imaging of the prostate.Radiology, 1988
- Prostate-Specific Antigen as a Serum Marker for Adenocarcinoma of the ProstateNew England Journal of Medicine, 1987
- Clinical stage B prostate carcinoma: staging with MR imaging.Radiology, 1987
- MR imaging of the prostate gland: normal anatomyAmerican Journal of Roentgenology, 1987