Rehospitalization and Survival for Stroke Patients in Managed Care and Traditional Medicare Plans
- 1 September 2005
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Medical Care
- Vol. 43 (9) , 902-910
- https://doi.org/10.1097/01.mlr.0000173597.97232.a0
Abstract
Background: Stroke affects more than 500,000 older persons each year in the United States, but no studies have compared older stroke patients in Medicare health maintenance organizations (HMOs) and fee-for-service (FFS) after recent changes in FFS reimbursement. Objectives: We sought to compare utilization and outcomes after stroke in Medicare HMO and FFS. Design: We reviewed administrative data in 11 regions from Medicare and a large national health plan. Subjects: We studied Medicare beneficiaries 65 years and older discharged with ischemic stroke during 1998–2000, ie, 4816 HMO patients and a random sample of 4187 FFS patients from 422 hospitals. Measures: We measured survival, rehospitalization, length of stay, discharge destination, and warfarin use. Results: Overall, HMO patients were younger, male, non-Caucasian, and had fewer comorbid conditions. When compared with FFS patients, HMO patients were more likely to be rehospitalized within 30 days for a primary diagnosis of ischemic stroke (Adjusted Hazard Ratio = 1.45, 95% Confidence Interval [CI] 1.14–1.83) or ill-defined conditions (eg, rehabilitation services) (2.87, 95% CI 1.85–4.46) and less likely to be rehospitalized for fluid and electrolyte disorders (0.54, 95% CI 0.34–0.87) or circulatory/respiratory problems (0.77, 95% CI 0.60–0.98). There were no consistent differences in 30-day mortality or in 1-year rehospitalization or mortality for 30-day survivors. HMO patients also were much less likely to be discharged to rehabilitation facilities, slightly less likely to be discharged to skilled nursing facilities and to have a shorter length of stay, and did not differ in the use of home care services or warfarin use when compared with FFS patients. Conclusions: Traditional measures of quality such as 30-day rehospitalization may not be valid when comparing HMO and FFS patients if differences might reflect an alternative service mix. Utilization of postacute care for FFS patients appears similar to HMO patients except for discharge to rehabilitation facilities.Keywords
This publication has 39 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Uniform Data System for Medical Rehabilitation ReportAmerican Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, 2003
- Alternative Models of Hospital‐Physician Affiliation as the United States Moves Away from Tight Managed CareThe Milbank Quarterly, 2003
- Classification of Race and Ethnicity: Implications for Public HealthAnnual Review of Public Health, 2003
- Validating Administrative Data in Stroke ResearchStroke, 2002
- Possible Effect of DRGs on the Classification of StrokeStroke, 2001
- HMO Membership and Patient Age and the Use of Specialty Care for Hospitalized Patients With Acute StrokeMedical Care, 1999
- Epidemiology of Recurrent Cerebral InfarctionStroke, 1999
- The Association Between the Quality of Inpatient Care and Early ReadmissionMedical Care, 1997
- Does Managed Care Lead To Better Or Worse Quality Of Care?Health Affairs, 1997
- What Role Do Neurologists Play in Determining the Costs and Outcomes of Stroke Patients?Stroke, 1996