This Body Which is Not One: Dealing with Differences
- 1 June 1999
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Body & Society
- Vol. 5 (2-3) , 77-92
- https://doi.org/10.1177/1357034x99005002005
Abstract
While body modification might generally seem to take the form of denaturalizing a biological given, this article looks at the same practice as normalizing the always already unstable corpus. The dominant discourse of the post-Enlightenment relies on the notion of the centrality of the individual subject within the singular and separate body, where distinctions between self and other are secure. Against this the incidence of monstrosity in general, with its disordered crossing of the boundaries of the proper, offers a gross insult. I look in particular at instances of conjoined twinning to demonstrate that the body can only be regarded as one by a process of material and discursive modification, which nonetheless finally fails to efface the trace of the monstrous other that frustrates the closure of the self-same.Keywords
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- Powers of HorrorPublished by Columbia University Press ,2024
- Leaky Bodies and BoundariesPublished by Taylor & Francis ,2015
- A Political Anatomy of Monsters, Hopeful and Otherwise: Teratogeny, Transcendentalism, and Evolutionary TheorizingIsis, 1994
- FreaksSocial Semiotics, 1991
- XVI. An account of a child with a double head. In a letter from Everard Home, Esq. F. R. S. to John Hunter, Esq. F. R. S.Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 1790