Conflict And Change In A State Correctional System: A Case Study In Program Implementation*
- 1 June 1989
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Criminal Justice Policy Review
- Vol. 3 (2) , 133-148
- https://doi.org/10.1177/088740348900300202
Abstract
While many programs have been implemented in juvenile probation departments and a wide variety of community agencies around the country, the domain of institutions and parole is still a "new frontier" for restitution. In 1985, the California Youth Authority recognized that restitution, implemented as a component of an early release, minimum security pre-release, or parole alternative could become part of the solution to the crowding crisis many of its institutions currently face. Working groups were formed at the highest bureaucratic levels to redefine the Youth Authority mission to include a concern with victims and policies to enable the collection of financial restitution. Attempts were made to implement projects with restitution components in both institutional and parole settings. This case study documents the evolution of one such effort, and what was learned in the process. A major implication for program development and policy change is that apparent reforms may simply be used to strengthen a punitive agenda unless new programs replace current practices, rather than incorporate existing sanctions.Keywords
This publication has 3 references indexed in Scilit:
- RESTITUTION AND RECIDIVISM RATES OF JUVENILE OFFENDERS: RESULTS FROM FOUR EXPERIMENTAL STUDIES*Criminology, 1986
- A comparison of programmatic and ‘ad hoc’ restitution in juvenile courtsJustice Quarterly, 1984
- The Cooptation of Fixed Sentencing ReformCrime & Delinquency, 1980