On prediction of individual sequences
Open Access
- 1 December 1999
- journal article
- Published by Institute of Mathematical Statistics in The Annals of Statistics
- Vol. 27 (6) , 1865-1895
- https://doi.org/10.1214/aos/1017939242
Abstract
Sequential randomized prediction of an arbitrary binary sequence is investigated. No assumption is made on the mechanism of generating the bit sequence. The goal of the predictor is to minimize its relative loss (or regret), that is, to make almost as few mistakes as the best “expert” in a fixed, possibly infinite, set of experts. We point out a surprising connection between this prediction problem and empirical process theory. First, in the special case of static (memoryless) expert, we completely characterize the minimax regret in terms of the maximum of an associated Rademacher process. Then we show general upper and lower bounds on the minimax regret in terms of the geometry of the class of experts. As main examples, we determine the exact order of magnitude of the minimax regret for the class of autoregressive linear predictors and for the class of Markov experts.Keywords
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- Sphere packing numbers for subsets of the Boolean n-cube with bounded Vapnik-Chervonenkis dimensionPublished by Elsevier ,2004
- Universal predictionIEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 1998
- A Game of Prediction with Expert AdviceJournal of Computer and System Sciences, 1998
- Majorizing measures: the generic chainingThe Annals of Probability, 1996
- Empirical Processes and Applications: An OverviewBernoulli, 1996
- The Weighted Majority AlgorithmInformation and Computation, 1994
- Universal prediction of individual sequencesIEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 1992
- On the Uniform Convergence of Relative Frequencies of Events to Their ProbabilitiesTheory of Probability and Its Applications, 1971
- Weighted sums of certain dependent random variablesTohoku Mathematical Journal, 1967
- Probability Inequalities for Sums of Bounded Random VariablesJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1963