Surgical resection of hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer: A systematic review of published studies
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 14 March 2006
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Springer Nature in British Journal of Cancer
- Vol. 94 (7) , 982-999
- https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6603033
Abstract
No consensus on the indications for surgical resection of colorectal liver metastases exists. This systematic review has been undertaken to assess the published evidence for its efficacy and safety and to identify prognostic factors. Studies were identified by computerised and hand searches of the literature, scanning references and contacting investigators. The outcome measures were overall survival, disease-free survival, postoperative morbidity and mortality, quality of life and cost effectiveness, and a qualitative summary of the trends across all studies was produced. Only 30 of 529 independent studies met all the eligibility criteria for the review, and data on 30-day mortality and morbidity only were included from a further nine studies. The best available evidence came from prospective case series, but only two studies reported outcomes for all patients undergoing surgery. The remainder reported outcomes for selected groups of patients: those undergoing hepatic resection or those undergoing curative resection. Postoperative mortality rates were generally low (median 2.8%). The majority of studies described only serious postoperative morbidity, the most common being bile leak and associated perihepatic abscess. Approximately 30% of patients remained alive 5 years after resection and around two-thirds of these are disease free. The quality of the majority of published papers was poor and ascertaining the benefits of surgical resection of colorectal hepatic metastases is difficult in the absence of randomised trials. However, it is clear that there is group of patients with liver metastases who may become long-term disease- free survivors following hepatic resection. Such survival is rare in apparently comparable patients who do not have surgical treatment. Further work is needed to more accurately define this group of patients and to determine whether the addition of adjuvant treatments results in improved survival.Keywords
This publication has 103 references indexed in Scilit:
- OncoSurge: A Strategy for Improving Resectability With Curative Intent in Metastatic Colorectal CancerJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2005
- A Randomized Controlled Trial of Fluorouracil Plus Leucovorin, Irinotecan, and Oxaliplatin Combinations in Patients With Previously Untreated Metastatic Colorectal CancerJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2004
- Resection rate and effect of postoperative chemotherapy on survival after surgery for colorectal liver metastasesBritish Journal of Surgery, 2001
- Management strategies for colorectal liver metastases — Part IISurgical Oncology, 1997
- Management strategies for colorectal liver metastases — Part ISurgical Oncology, 1997
- Resection of colorectal liver metastasesWorld Journal of Surgery, 1995
- Factors influencing the natural history of colorectal liver metastasesThe Lancet, 1994
- Pre- and Postoperative Carcinoembryonic Antigen Determinations in Hepatic Resection for Colorectal Metastases Predictive Value and Implications for Adjuvant Treatment Based on Multivariate AnalysisAnnals of Surgery, 1994
- Survival after hepatic resection for malignant tumoursBritish Journal of Surgery, 1992
- Natural history of patients with untreated liver metastases from colorectal cancerThe American Journal of Surgery, 1981