Respiratory Muscle Recruitment and Exercise Performance in Eucapnic and Hypercapnic Severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
- 1 March 2000
- journal article
- Published by American Thoracic Society in American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
- Vol. 161 (3) , 880-885
- https://doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm.161.3.9812102
Abstract
If chronic hypercapnia in patients with severe COPD occurs as a consequence of respiratory muscle (RM) weakness or fatigue, we would expect that ventilatory muscle recruitment (VMR) and exercise performance in stable hypercapnic patients would differ from those in eucapnic patients. We evaluated exercise performance and RM function at rest and during exercise in 19 eucapnic (PCO(2) 40 +/- 3 mm Hg), and 13 hypercapnic (PCO(2) 52 +/- 10 mm Hg) patients with severe COPD. A metabolic cart was used to determine V E, V O(2), V CO(2), and HR. Gastric (Pg) and esophageal (Ppl) balloons were used to measure Pg, Ppl, and Pdi. Ventilatory muscle recruitment pattern (VMR) was partitioned using end-inspiratory and end-expiratory Pg and Ppl. Hypercapnic patients had lower FEV(1) (0.60 +/- 0.24 versus 0.95 +/- 0.31 L, p < 0.001), MVV (28 +/- 11 versus 41 +/- 13 L, p < 0.001), resting PO(2) (61 +/- 11 versus 70 +/- 11 mm Hg, p < 0.001), peak PO(2) (60 +/- 20 versus 75 +/- 22 mm Hg, p < 0.005), and V E(max) (24 +/- 10 versus 32 +/- 12 L/min, p < 0.001). Patients in both groups had similar FRC (5.7 +/- 1.6 versus 5.0 +/- 1.5 L), V O(2)max (0.58 +/- 0.30 versus 0.76 +/- 0.32 L/min), Watts (45 +/- 48 versus 71 +/- 59), V E/MVV (88 +/- 33 versus 79 +/- 14), and HRmax (117 +/- 17 versus 128 +/- 18 beats/min). PI(max) (67 +/- 28 versus 65 +/- 32 cm H(2)O) and PE(max) (98 +/- 34 versus 96 +/- 40 cm H(2)O) were also similar in both groups. VMR (DeltaPg/DeltaPpl) at rest (-0.28 +/- 0.51 versus 0 +/- 0.35) and during exercise (0.4 +/- 0.2 versus 0.39 +/- 0.15) was equally affected in both groups. We conclude that exercise capacity and ventilatory muscle recruitment are similarly impaired in eucapnic and hypercapnic patients with severe COPD. These findings make inability of the lung to increase ventilation and not respiratory muscle dysfunction a more attractive explanation for CO(2) retention in stable hypercapnic patients.Keywords
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- Carbon dioxide responsiveness in COPD patients with and without chronic hypercapniaEuropean Respiratory Journal, 1995
- Exertional Breathlessness in Patients with Chronic Airflow Limitation: The Role of Lung HyperinflationAmerican Review of Respiratory Disease, 1993
- Prediction of Maximum Exercise Tolerance in Patients with COPDChest, 1991
- Inspiratory Muscle Dysfunction and Chronic Hypercapnia in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary DiseaseAmerican Review of Respiratory Disease, 1991
- Determinants of Maximum Exercise Capacity in Patients with Chronic Airflow ObstructionChest, 1989
- Standardization of Spirometry—1987 UpdateAmerican Review of Respiratory Disease, 1987
- Effect of Carbon Dioxide on Diaphragmatic Function in Human BeingsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1984
- Factors in the Interpretation of Mouth Occlusion Pressure during Measurements of ChemosensitivityChest, 1976
- Changes in skeletal muscle cell pH during graded changes in PCO2Respiration Physiology, 1976
- A RAPID PLETHYSMOGRAPHIC METHOD FOR MEASURING THORACIC GAS VOLUME: A COMPARISON WITH A NITROGEN WASHOUT METHOD FOR MEASURING FUNCTIONAL RESIDUAL CAPACITY IN NORMAL SUBJECTS 1Journal of Clinical Investigation, 1956