Diet, lifestyle and risk of K‐ras mutation‐positive and ‐negative colorectal adenomas
Open Access
- 27 April 2006
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in International Journal of Cancer
- Vol. 119 (2) , 398-405
- https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.21839
Abstract
K‐ras mutation‐positive (K‐ras+) and ‐negative (K‐ras−) colorectal adenomas may differ clinically and pathologically. As environmental compounds may cause mutations in the growth‐related K‐ras oncogene or affect clonal selection depending on mutational status, we evaluated whether the aetiology of K‐ras+ and K‐ras− adenomas differs. K‐ras mutations in codons 12 and 13 were assessed in colorectal adenoma tissue (K‐ras+: n = 81, K‐ras−: n = 453). Dietary and lifestyle data were collected through questionnaires that were also administered to 709 polyp‐free controls. Multiple logistic regression analyses showed that intake of vitamin B2 and monounsaturated fat were differently associated with risk of K‐ras+ and K‐ras− adenomas; vitamin B2 was inversely associated with K‐ras− (highest vs. lowest tertile: odds ratio (OR) = 0.70, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.50–0.97, p trend = 0.020), but not with K‐ras+ adenomas, and a positive association with monounsaturated fat was confined to K‐ras− adenomas (OR = 1.57, 95% CI = 1.06–2.34, p trend = 0.029). Besides, potential, not statistically significant, differences in risk arose because red meat was distinctly positively associated with K‐ras+ adenomas (OR = 1.70, 95% CI = 0.94–3.09, p trend = 0.061); total dietary and polyunsaturated fat tended to be inversely associated with risk of K‐ras+ but not of K‐ras− adenomas; inverse associations with dairy products, calcium, protein and tea were confined to K‐ras− adenomas, and smoking was more markedly positively associated with K‐ras− adenomas. No differences in risk of K‐ras+ and K‐ras− adenomas could be detected for other factors. In conclusion, dietary and lifestyle factors may influence risk of K‐ras+ and K‐ras− adenomas differently. However, epidemiological literature on diet, lifestyle and colorectal K‐ras mutations is inconsistent.Keywords
This publication has 39 references indexed in Scilit:
- Analysis of somatic molecular changes, clinicopathological features, family history, and germline mutations in colorectal cancer families: evidence for efficient diagnosis of HNPCC and for the existence of distinct groups of non-HNPCC familiesJournal of Medical Genetics, 2005
- Dietary Intake of Folate and Riboflavin, MTHFR C677T Genotype, and Colorectal Adenoma Risk: A Dutch Case-Control StudyCancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, 2005
- Dietary folate intake and k‐ras mutations in sporadic colon and rectal cancer in the Netherlands Cohort StudyInternational Journal of Cancer, 2005
- Organochlorine Exposure and Colorectal Cancer RiskEnvironmental Health Perspectives, 2004
- Fat and K-ras mutations in sporadic colorectal cancer in The Netherlands Cohort StudyCarcinogenesis: Integrative Cancer Research, 2004
- Exploring environmental causes of alteredras effects: Fragmentation plus integration?Molecular Carcinogenesis, 2003
- Potential for Selection Bias with Tumor Tissue Retrieval in Molecular Epidemiology StudiesAnnals of Epidemiology, 2002
- Kirsten ras mutations in patients with colorectal cancer: the ‘RASCAL II’ studyBritish Journal of Cancer, 2001
- Genetic epidemiology of mutated K-rasproto-oncogene, altered suppressor genes, and microsatellite instability in colorectal adenomasGut, 1999
- Evidence forras gene mutation in 2-amino-3-methylimidazo[4,5-f]quinoline–induced colonic aberrant crypts in the ratMolecular Carcinogenesis, 1995