A Comparison of Fecal Occult-Blood Tests for Colorectal-Cancer Screening
Open Access
- 18 January 1996
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Massachusetts Medical Society in New England Journal of Medicine
- Vol. 334 (3) , 155-160
- https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199601183340304
Abstract
Hemoccult II, a widely used guaiac test for fecal occult blood, has a low sensitivity for detecting colorectal neoplasms in asymptomatic patients at average risk. In such patients, the performance characteristics of screening tests developed to improve on Hemoccult II are not known. A set of three fecal occult-blood tests — Hemoccult II; Hemoccult II Sensa, a more sensitive guaiac test; and HemeSelect, an immunochemical test for human hemoglobin — was mailed to all patients 50 years of age or older who were scheduled for personal health appraisals at the Kaiser Permanente Medical Center in Oakland, California. The performance of each test and of a combination test (HemeSelect to confirm positive Hemoccult II Sensa results) was evaluated by identifying screened patients who had colorectal neoplasms (carcinoma or a polyp >1 cm in diameter) in the two years after screening. Of the 10,702 eligible patients, 8104 (75.7 percent) had at least one interpretable sample and were screened on the basis of at least one test; 96 percent of these patients had complete two-year follow-up. The sensitivity of the tests for detecting carcinoma was lowest with Hemoccult II (37.1 percent; 95 percent confidence interval, 19.7 to 54.6 percent), intermediate with the combination test (65.6 percent; 95 percent confidence interval, 47.6 to 83.6 percent) and with HemeSelect (68.8 percent; 95 percent confidence interval, 51.1 to 86.4 percent), and highest with Hemoccult II Sensa (79.4 percent; 95 percent confidence interval, 64.3 to 94.5 percent). The specificity for detecting carcinoma was 86.7 percent with Hemoccult II Sensa, 94.4 percent with HemeSelect, 97.3 percent with the combination test, and 97.7 percent with Hemoccult II. HemeSelect and the combination test detected more colorectal carcinomas and polyps than Hemoccult II, with only slight increases in the number of colonoscopies needed. HemeSelect and a combination test in which HemeSelect is used to confirm positive Hemoccult II Sensa results improve on Hemoccult II in screening patients for colorectal carcinoma.Keywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Endoscopic and histologic correlates of colorectal polyp bleedingGastrointestinal Endoscopy, 1995
- Fecal occult blood tests: What's new?Gastroenterology, 1993
- Reducing Mortality from Colorectal Cancer by Screening for Fecal Occult BloodNew England Journal of Medicine, 1993
- Prevention of colorectal cancer by once-only sigmoidoscopyThe Lancet, 1993
- Sigmoidoscopic screening in the 1990sJAMA, 1993
- Accuracy of fecal occult blood screening for colorectal neoplasia. A prospective study using Hemoccult and HemoQuant testsPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1993
- How should we screen for colorectal cancer?Published by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1993
- Small adenomas detected during fecal occult blood test screening for colorectal cancer. The impact of serendipityJAMA, 1990
- Hemoccult Screening in Detecting Colorectal Neoplasm: Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predictive ValueAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1990
- Occult blood screening for colorectal carcinoma: A critical reviewGastroenterology, 1985