Meta-analysis of prophylactic or empirical antifungal treatment versus placebo or no treatment in patients with cancer complicated by neutropenia
- 26 April 1997
- Vol. 314 (7089) , 1238
- https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.314.7089.1238
Abstract
Objective:To determine whether antifungal agents given prophylactically or empirically decrease morbidity and mortality in patients with cancer complicated by neutropenia. Design:Meta-analysis of randomised trials of amphotericin B, various lipid soluble formulations of amphotericin B (for example, AmBisome), fluconazole, ketoconazole, miconazole, or itraconazole compared with placebo or no treatment. Setting:Trials conducted anywhere in the world. Subjects:Patients with cancer complicated by neutropenia. Main outcome measures:Mortality, invasive fungal infection (defined as positive blood culture, oesophageal candidiasis, or lung or deep tissue infection), and colonisation. Results:24 trials with 2758 randomised patients were reviewed; the total number of deaths was 434. Prophylactic or empirical treatment with antifungals as a group had no effect on mortality (odds ratio 0.92; 95% confidence interval 0.74 to 1.14). Amphotericin B decreased mortality significantly (0.58; 0.37 to 0.93) but the studies were small and the difference in number of deaths was only 15. Antifungal treatment decreased the incidence of invasive fungal infection (0.47; 0.35 to 0.64) and fungal colonisation (0.45; 0.30 to 0.69). For every 73 patients treated (95% confidence interval 48 to 158) one case of fungal invasion was prevented in surviving patients. Conclusions:There seems to be no survival benefit of antifungal agents given prophylactically or empirically to patients with cancer complicated by neutropenia. These agents should be restricted to patients with proved infection and those in randomised trials. A large, definitive placebo controlled trial of amphotericin B is needed. Prophylactic or empirical treatment with antifungal agents is often recommended for patients with cancer complicated by neutropenia for fear that they might die if treatment is delayed A meta-analysis has failed to show a convincing survival benefit of antifungal agents in patients with cancer complicated by neutropenia Amphotericin B and fluconazole decrease the incidence of invasive fungal infections Seventy three patients need to be treated to prevent one case of fungal invasion in surviving patients The use of antifungal agents should be restricted to patients with proved infectionsKeywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- The prophylactic use of low-dose amphotericin B in bone marrow transplant patientsThe American Journal of Medicine, 1994
- Editorial Response: Evolving Risk Factors for Invasive Fungal Infections--All Neutropenic Patients Are Not the SameClinical Infectious Diseases, 1994
- Prophylactic Intravenous Amphotericin B in Neutropenic Autologous Bone Marrow Transplant RecipientsThe Journal of Infectious Diseases, 1992
- A Controlled Trial of Fluconazole to Prevent Fungal Infections in Patients Undergoing Bone Marrow TransplantationNew England Journal of Medicine, 1992
- Underreporting Research Is Scientific MisconductJAMA, 1990
- Empiric antifungal therapy in febrile granulocytopenic patientsThe American Journal of Medicine, 1989
- Prevention of fungal sepsis in patients with prolonged neutropenia: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of intravenous miconazoleThe American Journal of Medicine, 1987
- Clinical Experience With Amphotericin B in Acute Myelogenous LeukemiaSouthern Medical Journal, 1986
- Beta blockade during and after myocardial infarction: An overview of the randomized trialsProgress in Cardiovascular Diseases, 1985
- Empiric antibiotic and antifungal therapy for cancer patients with prolonged fever and granulocytopeniaThe American Journal of Medicine, 1982