On “Capturing Facts Alive in the past” (Or Present): Response to Fotiadis and to Little
- 1 July 1994
- journal article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in American Antiquity
- Vol. 59 (3) , 556-560
- https://doi.org/10.2307/282468
Abstract
Michael Fotiadis (1994) and Barbara Little (1994) both question the oppositions that structure current debate about the “objectivity” of archaeological science; they raise concerns about my own proposal for a “mitigated objectivism” where it reaffirms these oppositions. I welcome their discussion and offer three responses to clarify and situate my own position. Most valuable, they identify several lines of inquiry that should be pursued beyond the philosophical analyses I have developed, in this instance of gender research.Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- What is Archaeology's “Mitigated Objectivism” Mitigated by? Comments on WylieAmerican Antiquity, 1994
- Consider the Hermaphroditic Mind: Comment on “The Interplay of Evidential Constraints and Political Interests: Recent Archaeological Research on Gender”American Antiquity, 1994
- The Interplay of Evidential Constraints and Political Interests: Recent Archaeological Research on GenderAmerican Antiquity, 1992
- Gender and Archaeological KnowledgePublished by Springer Nature ,1992
- On “Heavily Decomposing Red Herrings”: Scientific Method in Archaeology and the Ladening of Evidence with TheoryPublished by Springer Nature ,1992
- Knowledge, Practice and Mere ConstructionSocial Studies of Science, 1990
- Archaeological Cables and Tacking: The Implications of Practice for Bernstein's ‘Options Beyond Objectivism and Relativism’Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 1989