On the strength of the Sikorski extension theorem for Boolean algebras
- 1 September 1983
- journal article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in The Journal of Symbolic Logic
- Vol. 48 (3) , 841-846
- https://doi.org/10.2307/2273477
Abstract
The Sikorski Extension Theorem [6] states that, for any Boolean algebra A and any complete Boolean algebra B, any homomorphism of a subalgebra of A into B can be extended to the whole of A. That is,Inj: Any complete Boolean algebra is injective (in the category of Boolean algebras).The proof of Inj uses the axiom of choice (AC); thus the implication AC → Inj can be proved in Zermelo-Fraenkel set theory (ZF). On the other hand, the Boolean prime ideal theoremBPI: Every Boolean algebra contains a prime ideal (or, equivalently, an ultrafilter)may be equivalently stated as:The two element Boolean algebra 2 is injective,and so the implication Inj → BPI can be proved in ZF.In [3], Luxemburg surmises that this last implication cannot be reversed in ZF. It is the main purpose of this paper to show that this surmise is correct. We shall do this by showing that Inj implies that BPI holds in every Boolean extension of the universe of sets, and then invoking a recent result of Monro [5] to the effect that BPI does not yield this conclusion.Keywords
This publication has 3 references indexed in Scilit:
- Iterated Cohen Extensions and Souslin's ProblemAnnals of Mathematics, 1971
- Models of ZF-Set TheoryLecture Notes in Mathematics, 1971
- A remark on Sikorski's extension theorem for homomorphisms in the theory of Boolean algebrasFundamenta Mathematicae, 1964