A Randomized Trial to Increase Smoking Intervention by Physicians
- 14 April 1989
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Medical Association (AMA) in JAMA
- Vol. 261 (14) , 2101-2106
- https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1989.03420140103035
Abstract
Sixty-six physicians were randomized to three groups to conduct a 1-month campaign to help their patients stop smoking. The workshop group received free patient education materials and a 6-hour training workshop. The materials group received free patient education materials, and the no-assistance group received nothing. A telephone interview was completed with 89% of the 6767 eligible adult patients seen during the month of the campaign. The brief training program and patient education materials marginally increased the smoking intervention activities of volunteer physicians in private practice. Both workshop and materials physicians asked 54% of their smoking patients to stop; no-assistance physicians asked 40%. One year later, 36% of patients who had not even been asked by their doctors if they smoked reported that they had tried to stop smoking. If the physician had asked the patient if he or she smoked, the probability of a quit attempt was 47%. Patients who had been asked if they smoked were more likely to claim to have stopped (13%) than patients who had not been asked (9%). However, the proportion of patients claiming continued abstinence (range, 12% to 14%) was not related to the group of the physician. (JAMA. 1989;261:2101-2106)Keywords
This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- Smoking patterns among social contacts of smokers, ex-smokers, and never smokers: The doctors helping smokers studyPreventive Medicine, 1987
- The systematic practice of preventive cardiologyThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1987
- Nutrition counseling in private practice: Attitudes and activities of family physiciansPreventive Medicine, 1984
- Effect of general practitioners' advice against smokingBMJ, 1979
- Smoking and Alcohol Abuse: A Comparison of Their Economic ConsequencesNew England Journal of Medicine, 1978