TREATING SELF‐INJURY: WATER MIST SPRAY VERSUS FACIAL SCREENING OR FORCED ARM EXERCISE
- 1 December 1986
- journal article
- case report
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis
- Vol. 19 (4) , 403-410
- https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1986.19-403
Abstract
In three experiments, the effect of water mist spray on self-injurious and collateral behaviors was compared with either facial screening or forced arm exercise. Water mist spray was as effective as facial screening in suppressing face-slapping in Experiment 1. However, it was not as effective as facial screening for self-injurious finger-licking in Experiment 2 or forced arm exercise for excessive ear-rubbing in Experiment 3. These results suggest that while water mist spray is effective, it may be less so than alternative procedures. In Experiments 2 and 3 there was a consistent decrease in the occurrence of untreated maladaptive behaviors. In addition, there was a moderate increase in appropriate social interaction in Experiment 2 and a substantial increase in Experiment 3.Keywords
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- SUPPRESSIVE EFFECTS OF VISUAL AND FACIAL SCREENING ON SELF-INJURIOUS FINGER-SUCKING1986
- Facial Screening: History and Critical ReviewAustralia and New Zealand Journal of Developmental Disabilities, 1983
- Using water mist to reduce self-injurious and stereotypic behaviorApplied Research in Mental Retardation, 1983
- TREATMENT OF SELF‐INJURIOUS BEHAVIOR USING A WATER MIST: INITIAL RESPONSE SUPPRESSION AND GENERALIZATIONJournal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1980
- ALTERNATING TREATMENTS DESIGN: ONE STRATEGY FOR COMPARING THE EFFECTS OF TWO TREATMENTS IN A SINGLE SUBJECTJournal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1979
- INCREASING SPONTANEOUS PLAY BY SUPPRESSING SELF‐STIMULATION IN AUTISTIC CHILDREN1Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1974