Carcinoma of Unknown Primary Site: Sequential Treatment with Paclitaxel/Carboplatin/Etoposide and Gemcitabine/Irinotecan: A Minnie Pearl Cancer Research Network Phase II Trial
- 1 November 2004
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in The Oncologist
- Vol. 9 (6) , 644-652
- https://doi.org/10.1634/theoncologist.9-6-644
Abstract
Purpose. To evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of the sequential administration of paclitaxel (Taxol®; Bristol-Myers Squibb; Princeton, NJ), carboplatin (Paraplatin®; Bristol-Myers Squibb), and oral etoposide (VePesid®; Bristol-Myers Squibb) followed by gemcitabine (Gemzar®; Eli Lilly; Indianapolis, IN) and irinotecan (Campostar®; Pfizer Pharmaceuticals; New York, NY) in the first-line treatment of patients with carcinoma of unknown primary site. Patients and Methods. One hundred thirty-two patients were treated with sequential combination chemotherapy for a maximum of six cycles. All patients had relatively poor prognostic features. Fifty-nine patients had well-differentiated adenocarcinoma, 73 patients had poorly differentiated carcinoma, and 121 patients had performance status scores of 0 or 1. Results. Thirty-three (30%) of 111 assessable patients (95% confidence interval 27%–33%) had objective responses to treatment (26 partial responses, seven complete responses). The combination of gemcitabine and irinotecan was associated with significantly less toxicity than the triple-drug regimen and improved the responses in several patients (10%). The response rates were similar in the two major histologic tumor types, but were lower for patients with liver-dominant tumors (13%) and higher for patients with lymph-node-dominant tumors (50%). The median progression-free survival time, median survival time, and actuarial survival rates at 1 and 2 years were 5.7 months, 9.1 months, 35%, and 16%, respectively. Conclusions. Sequential combination chemotherapy with paclitaxel/carboplatin/oral etoposide and gemcitabine/irinotecan is an active treatment for patients with carcinoma of unknown primary site, but overall toxicities are greater than those seen with other combinations of new drugs and survival appears similar to that observed in 264 other patients treated in our four previous phase II trials. A better understanding of the biology of these heterogeneous tumors will likely lead to improved therapy for these patients.Keywords
Funding Information
- Minnie Pearl Cancer Foundation, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, and Pfizer
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- Cisplatin in Combination With Either Gemcitabine or Irinotecan in Carcinomas of Unknown Primary Site: Results of a Randomized Phase II Study—Trial for the French Study Group on Carcinomas of Unknown Primary (GEFCAPI 01)Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2003
- Diagnostic and therapeutic management of cancer of an unknown primaryEuropean Journal Of Cancer, 2003
- Gemcitabine, Carboplatin, and Paclitaxel for Patients With Carcinoma of Unknown Primary Site: A Minnie Pearl Cancer Research Network StudyJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2002
- Gemcitabine, Carboplatin, and Paclitaxel for Patients With Carcinoma of Unknown Primary Site: A Minnie Pearl Cancer Research Network StudyJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2002
- Gemcitabine in the Second-Line Therapy of Patients with Carcinoma of Unknown Primary Site: A Phase II Trial of the Minnie Pearl Cancer Research NetworkCancer Investigation, 2001
- Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel in Unknown Primary Carcinoma: A Phase II Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group StudyJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2000
- Carcinoma of unknown primary site: Phase II trials with docetaxel plus cisplatin or carboplatinAnnals of Oncology, 2000
- Carcinoma of unknown primary site: treatment with 1-hour paclitaxel, carboplatin, and extended-schedule etoposide.Journal of Clinical Oncology, 1997
- Optimal two-stage designs for phase II clinical trialsControlled Clinical Trials, 1989
- Nonparametric Estimation from Incomplete ObservationsJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1958