Ethical Considerations Surrounding First Time Procedures: A Study and Analysis of Patient Attitudes Toward Spinal Taps by Students
- 1 September 1992
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Project MUSE in Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal
- Vol. 2 (3) , 217-231
- https://doi.org/10.1353/ken.0.0108
Abstract
A patient is not always told when a student is performing a procedure for the first time. Withholding this information is a form of deception. It is justified on paternalistic grounds (it is in the patient's interest not to know), or on public policy grounds (given the choice, patients would refuse, thus compromising the training of future physicians). Using the spinal tap procedure (lumbar puncture) as a paradigm, 173 patients were surveyed to determine how they felt about first time procedures by medical students, interns, and residents. The patients indicated that they would be willing to be the subject for a student's (52%), intern's (62%), or resident's (66%) first spinal tap. This paper reassesses the ethics of consent for first time procedures based on responses to this survey.Keywords
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- Informed Consent for Lumbar PunctureArchives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, 1989
- A national survey concerning the ethical aspects of informed consent and role of medical studentsAcademic Medicine, 1988
- Legal implications of clinical supervision of medical students and residentsAcademic Medicine, 1983
- Decision-making and informed consent: A study of the impact of disclosed informationSocial Indicators Research, 1980
- Complexities of Informed ConsentThe Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 1978
- The Moral Law, or Kant's Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals.The Journal of Philosophy, 1950