Lack of correlation between rejection of tumor cells co‐expressing interleukin‐2 and B7.1 and vaccine efficiency
- 1 July 1997
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in European Journal of Immunology
- Vol. 27 (7) , 1657-1662
- https://doi.org/10.1002/eji.1830270710
Abstract
Genetically modifying tumor cells to express a variety of cytokines such as interleukin‐2 (IL‐2) or the co‐stimulatory molecule B7.1 leads to increased immunogenicity and reduced tumorigenicity of tumors in several models with T cells involved in the process. We have previously reported decreased tumorigenicity of the murine plasmacytoma J558L [major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I+ and class II−] expressing IL‐2 or B7.1. When systemic immunity was analyzed, immunization with either J558‐IL2 or J558‐B7.1 cells generated moderate protection against unmodified J558L tumor cells, comparable to immunization with a tumor cells/adjuvant Corynebacterium parvum mixture. In this study, we asked whether the co‐expression of IL‐2 and B7.1 in tumor cells would augment vaccine potency, cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL) activity and protective immunity. Rejection of single IL‐2 or B7.1 or co‐transfected IL‐2/B7.1 cells occurred in most syngeneic animals but not in T cell‐deficient nude mice, thus confirming that T cells were required for tumor rejection. We knew from previous experiments that CD8+ T cells were responsible for rejection. Surprisingly, immunization with J558‐IL2/B7.1 cells followed by challenge with parental J558L caused a reduction in systemic protection as compared to J558‐B7.1 or J558‐IL2 alone. We examined the mechanism underlying this unexpected result: 6 days after injection of J558‐IL2/B7.1 cells, tumor were nearly completely destroyed and were almost devoid of CD8+ cells, while CD8+ cells were increased in both IL‐2‐ and B7.1‐transfected tumors. In addition, immunization with J558‐IL2/B7.1 tumors had an adverse effect on the generation of CTL. Mice immunized with J558‐B7.1 and to a lesser extent J558‐IL2 cells mounted a CTL response against J558L cells while, in contrast, no CTL activity could be detected in mice immunized with J558‐IL2/B7.1, thus showing a correlation between the absence of CTL activity and the lack of in vivo protection. We demonstrate that “hyperstimulation” of the immune response by genetically modified cancer vaccines can have adverse effects on tumor immunity, even though the mechanism is not yet completely understood.Keywords
This publication has 28 references indexed in Scilit:
- Peptide-based cancer vaccinesCurrent Opinion in Immunology, 1996
- Expression of Co-Stimulatory Molecules by Tumor Cells Decreases Tumorigenicity but May Also Reduce Systemic Antitumor ImmunityHuman Gene Therapy, 1996
- CD28/B7 SYSTEM OF T CELL COSTIMULATIONAnnual Review of Immunology, 1996
- Coexpression of Interleukin-4 and B7.1 in Murine Tumor Cells Leads to Improved Tumor Rejection and Vaccine Effect Compared to Single Gene Transfectants and a Classical AdjuvantHuman Gene Therapy, 1996
- Does B7-1 expression confer antigen-presenting cell capacity to tumors in vivo?The Journal of Experimental Medicine, 1996
- Tumor cells cotransfected with interleukin‐7 and B7.1 genes induce CD25 and CD28 on tumor‐infiltrating T lymphocytes and are strong vaccinesEuropean Journal of Immunology, 1995
- Role of Bone Marrow-Derived Cells in Presenting MHC Class I-Restricted Tumor AntigensScience, 1994
- T cell costimulation by B7/BB1 induces CD8 T cell-dependent tumor rejection: an important role of B7/BB1 in the induction, recruitment, and effector function of antitumor T cells.The Journal of Experimental Medicine, 1994
- Tumor Rejection After Direct Costimulation of CD8 + T Cells by B7-Transfected Melanoma CellsScience, 1993
- Structure, expression, and T cell costimulatory activity of the murine homologue of the human B lymphocyte activation antigen B7.The Journal of Experimental Medicine, 1991