The Use of Masking in Evoked Response Audiometry
- 1 January 1974
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in International Journal of Audiology
- Vol. 13 (4) , 349-355
- https://doi.org/10.3109/00206097409071693
Abstract
The authors studied the influence of white noise on acoustically evoked potetials. In evoked reponse audiometry (ERA), the rules of masking in common use in subjective audiometry must be applied. Bone conduction caused an evoked potential from the opposite ear even for 0-5 dB. To avoid cross-hearing, masking of the opposite ear is required. A noise level below 50 dB had only little effect on the evoked potentials of the contralateral ear For contralateral noise levels exceeding 60 dB or monaural stimulation with white noise and tones, the threshold was displaced by the amount of the masking noise level, and the steepness of the input-output curve was increased. In 16 patients with inner ear deafness, this masking effect showed a different behaviour. Thus an additional diagnosis on inner ear deafness is possible in ERAKeywords
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- Advantage of Quasi-Simultaneous Stimulation in ERAInternational Journal of Audiology, 1974
- Amplitude of Evoked Responses to Tones of High IntensityActa Oto-Laryngologica, 1970
- An Investigation of the Human Cortical Evoked Potential Under Conditions Of Monaural and Binaural StimulationActa Oto-Laryngologica, 1969
- Relations of the Human Vertex Potential to Acoustic Input: Loudness and MaskingThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1968