Defining functional distances over Gene Ontology
Open Access
- 25 January 2008
- journal article
- Published by Springer Nature in BMC Bioinformatics
- Vol. 9 (1) , 50
- https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-9-50
Abstract
A fundamental problem when trying to define the functional relationships between proteins is the difficulty in quantifying functional similarities, even when well-structured ontologies exist regarding the activity of proteins (i.e. 'gene ontology' -GO-). However, functional metrics can overcome the problems in the comparing and evaluating functional assignments and predictions. As a reference of proximity, previous approaches to compare GO terms considered linkage in terms of ontology weighted by a probability distribution that balances the non-uniform 'richness' of different parts of the Direct Acyclic Graph. Here, we have followed a different approach to quantify functional similarities between GO terms.Keywords
This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- DAVID Bioinformatics Resources: expanded annotation database and novel algorithms to better extract biology from large gene listsNucleic Acids Research, 2007
- A new method to measure the semantic similarity of GO termsBioinformatics, 2007
- Interactive Tree Of Life (iTOL): an online tool for phylogenetic tree display and annotationBioinformatics, 2006
- Automated protein function prediction--the genomic challengeBriefings in Bioinformatics, 2006
- Automatic annotation of protein functionCurrent Opinion in Structural Biology, 2005
- Controlled vocabularies in bioinformatics: a case study in the gene ontologyDrug Discovery Today: BIOSILICO, 2004
- Obol: integrating language and meaning in bio‐ontologiesComparative and Functional Genomics, 2004
- Investigating semantic similarity measures across the Gene Ontology: the relationship between sequence and annotationBioinformatics, 2003
- The Gene Ontology Annotation (GOA) Project: Implementation of GO in SWISS-PROT, TrEMBL, and InterProGenome Research, 2003
- Conserved Clusters of Functionally Related Genes in Two Bacterial GenomesJournal of Molecular Evolution, 1997