The Case for a More Aggressive Approach to Staghorn Stones
- 1 May 1976
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Journal of Urology
- Vol. 115 (5) , 505-506
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5347(17)59258-7
Abstract
The threat to the patient and kidney of leaving a large staghorn stone in situ in 60 cases is compared to the risk of operative removal in 125 cases. The overall mortality rate in patients treated conservatively was 28%, carcinoma developing in 4 cases and a life-threatening pyonephrosis in 16. Of patients treated by removal of the stone the mortality rate was 7.2% (during 10 yr of observation) and stones recurred in 21 cases. These studies refute the notion of the silent staghorn calculus and demonstrate that operative removal is safer for the patient and kidney.This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Residual Renal StoneBritish Journal of Urology, 1975
- One Hundred Cases of Nephrolithotomy Under HypothermiaJournal of Urology, 1974
- Simple Renal HypothermiaBritish Journal of Urology, 1974
- The Fate of the Unoperated Staghorn CalculusBritish Journal of Urology, 1973
- EXTENDED PYELOLITHOTOMY FOR RENAL CALCULIBritish Journal of Urology, 1967
- New Surgical Concepts in Removing Renal CalculiUrologia Internationalis, 1965
- Surgical Treatment of Multiple, Recurrent, Branched, Renal (staghorn) Calculi by Pyelo-Nephro-Ileo-Vesical AnastomosisJournal of Urology, 1961