A COMPARISON OF THREE METHODS FOR ESTABLISHING MINIMUM STANDARDS ON THE NATIONAL TEACHER EXAMINATIONS
- 1 June 1984
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Educational Measurement
- Vol. 21 (2) , 113-129
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3984.1984.tb00224.x
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- An Iterative Structured Judgment Process for Establishing Standards on Competency Tests: Theory and ApplicationEducational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 1982
- Standard Setting Issues and MethodsApplied Psychological Measurement, 1980
- COMPARABILITY OF METHODS FOR SETTING STANDARDSJournal of Educational Measurement, 1980
- AN EMPIRICAL COMPARISON OF JUDGMENTAL APPROACHES TO STANDARD SETTING PROCEDURESETS Research Report Series, 1980
- A Comparison of the Nedelsky and Angoff Cutting Score Procedures Using Generalizability TheoryApplied Psychological Measurement, 1980
- The Effect of Misinformation, Partial Information, and Guessing on Expected Multiple-Choice Test Item ScoresApplied Psychological Measurement, 1980
- STANDARDS AND CRITERIAJournal of Educational Measurement, 1978
- A Preliminary Investigation of Two Procedures for Setting Examination StandardsEducational and Psychological Measurement, 1976
- Absolute Grading Standards for Objective TestsEducational and Psychological Measurement, 1954
- Estimation of the Reliability of RatingsPsychometrika, 1951