Environmental Enrichment for Laboratory Animals * Commentary: Evalyn F. Segal * Commentary: Joseph S. Spinelli
Open Access
- 1 January 1989
- journal article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in ILAR Journal
- Vol. 31 (2) , 5-11
- https://doi.org/10.1093/ilar.31.2.5
Abstract
Prior to the 1960s, many laboratory animals lived in “solitary confinement” in cages that were cramped, bare, and without stimulation. A typical environment might be described as follows: The cage walls are stainless steel bars because they are easy to wash. Floor space is often minimal. The closest conspecific is four feet away on days when no experiments occur. The view consists of four beige walls, fluorescent lights on a white ceiling, and an occasional sighting of another animal that shares the room. Although there is some variation—like solid walls instead of bars or clear plastic instead of stainless steel—the laboratory environment is rather barren.Keywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Effects of manipulatable objects on the activity of captive capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella)Zoo Biology, 1985
- Battery hens name their price: Consumer demand theory and the measurement of ethological ‘needs’Animal Behaviour, 1983
- Effects of group-rearing or partial isolation on later social behaviour of calvesAnimal Behaviour, 1978
- Response patterns of female Photinus macdermotti firefly to artificial flashesAnimal Behaviour, 1977
- Control of Their Environment Reduces Emotionality in RatsScience, 1973
- A quantitative comparison of the behaviour of a wild and a caged baboon groupAnimal Behaviour, 1967
- Behavioral Aspects of Reproduction in PrimatesJournal of Animal Science, 1966
- The effects of an enriched environment on the histology of the rat cerebral cortexJournal of Comparative Neurology, 1964
- Social Deprivation in MonkeysScientific American, 1962
- The effects of early restriction on activity in dogs.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1954