Volume as a surrogate for percutaneous coronary intervention quality: is this the right measuring stick?
- 31 December 2003
- journal article
- editorial
- Published by Elsevier in American Heart Journal
- Vol. 146 (6) , 932-934
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-8703(03)00515-5
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- Analysis of the institutional volume-outcome relations for balloon angioplasty and stenting in the stent era in CaliforniaAmerican Heart Journal, 2003
- Hierarchical modeling: Its time has comeAmerican Heart Journal, 2003
- Comparing hierarchical modeling with traditional logistic regression analysis among patients hospitalized with acute myocardial infarction: Should we be analyzing cardiovascular outcomes data differently?American Heart Journal, 2003
- Thrombolytic Therapy vs Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Myocardial Infarction in Patients Presenting to Hospitals Without On-site Cardiac SurgeryA Randomized Controlled TrialJAMA, 2002
- A contemporary overview of percutaneous coronary interventionsJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 2002
- Development of a risk adjustment mortality model using the American College of Cardiology–National Cardiovascular Data Registry (ACC–NCDR) experience: 1998–2000Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 2002
- The American College of Cardiology-National Cardiovascular Data Registry™ (ACC-NCDR™): building a national clinical data repositoryJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 2001
- Association between percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty volumes and outcomes in the healthcare cost and utilization project 1993-1994The American Journal of Cardiology, 1999
- The Relation between the Volume of Coronary Angioplasty Procedures at Hospitals Treating Medicare Beneficiaries and Short-Term MortalityNew England Journal of Medicine, 1994