Is coupled cluster singles and doubles (CCSD) more computationally intensive than quadratic configuration interaction (QCISD)?
- 1 April 1989
- journal article
- conference paper
- Published by AIP Publishing in The Journal of Chemical Physics
- Vol. 90 (7) , 3700-3703
- https://doi.org/10.1063/1.455827
Abstract
It is shown that the recently proposed QCI method including all single and double substitutions has essentially the same computational requirements as the more complete CCSD approach. If properly formulated, the CCSD equations contain at most quadratic terms in the excitation amplitudes.Keywords
This publication has 27 references indexed in Scilit:
- The anharmonic force fields of HOF and F2OThe Journal of Chemical Physics, 1988
- Relative energies of silaethylene and methylsilyleneJournal of the American Chemical Society, 1988
- Equilibrium structures and vibrational frequencies for diatomic molecules. An assessment of the CCSDT-1 method, incorporating coupled-cluster single, double, and linearized triple excitationsChemical Physics Letters, 1988
- An open-shell spin-restricted coupled cluster method: application to ionization potentials in nitrogenThe Journal of Physical Chemistry, 1988
- A study of the Be2 potential curve using the full (CCSDT) coupled-cluster method: The importance of T4 clustersThe Journal of Chemical Physics, 1988
- Do stable isomers of N3H3 exist?Journal of the American Chemical Society, 1988
- Mechanism of the photodissociation of s-tetrazine: a unimolecular triple dissociationJournal of the American Chemical Society, 1986
- A full coupled-cluster singles and doubles model: The inclusion of disconnected triplesThe Journal of Chemical Physics, 1982
- Electron correlation theories and their application to the study of simple reaction potential surfacesInternational Journal of Quantum Chemistry, 1978
- Correlation Problems in Atomic and Molecular Systems. IV. Extended Coupled-Pair Many-Electron Theory and Its Application to the BMoleculePhysical Review A, 1972