A comparison of random balance and two-stage group screening designs: A case study
- 1 January 1984
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods
- Vol. 13 (21) , 2625-2648
- https://doi.org/10.1080/03610928408828848
Abstract
In this paper we focus on the problem of supersaturated (fewer runs than factors) screening experiments. We consider two major types of designs which have been proposed in this situ¬ation: random balance and two-stage group screening. We discuss the relative merits and demerits of each strategy. In addition, we compare the performance of these strategies by means of a case study in which 100 factors are screened in 20,42,62, and 84 runs.Keywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- On the Performance of Two-Stage Group Screening ExperimentsTechnometrics, 1984
- Factor Screening in Simulation: Evaluation of Two Strategies Based on Random Balance SamplingManagement Science, 1984
- The Performance of Two-Stage Group Screening in Factor Screening ExperimentsTechnometrics, 1982
- Linear Models with Exchangeably Distributed ErrorsJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1979
- Screening Designs for Poly-Factor ExperimentationTechnometrics, 1975
- Some Systematic Supersaturated DesignsTechnometrics, 1962
- A Sequential Method for Screening Experimental VariablesJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1962
- Random Allocation Designs I: On General Classes of Estimation MethodsThe Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 1960
- The Application of Random Balance DesignsTechnometrics, 1959
- THE DESIGN OF OPTIMUM MULTIFACTORIAL EXPERIMENTSBiometrika, 1946