Evidence that comodulation detection differences depend on within-channel mechanisms
- 1 January 2002
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Acoustical Society of America (ASA) in The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
- Vol. 111 (1) , 309-319
- https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1426373
Abstract
The threshold for detecting a narrow-band noise signal in the presence of one or more masking noise bands is higher when the signal and masker bands have the same envelope (i.e., are comodulated) than when they have independent envelopes. This is called a comodulation detection difference (CDD). CDD might be caused by perceptual grouping of the signal and masker bands when they are comodulated. This hypothesis leads to the prediction that some masking should occur for comodulated bands, even when they are widely separated in frequency. An alternative hypothesis is that CDD occurs because, when the signal and masker bands are independent, the signal band can be detected in the dips of the masker envelope. This leads to the prediction that CDD should only occur when the masker produces significant excitation at the signal place. Experiment 1 tested these predictions in a paradigm similar to two-tone masking. The signal was a 20-Hz-wide noise centered at 1500 Hz, and the masker consisted of two bands of noise on either side of the signal frequency, whose envelopes were either comodulated (condition C) or uncorrelated (condition U) with the envelope of the signal band. In a third condition (S), the signal band was replaced by a sinusoid. The frequency separation between the signal and masker bands, was varied from 100 to 1400 Hz. Thresholds were very similar for conditions U and S; thresholds declined progressively as increased beyond 200 Hz, and reached the absolute threshold for For values of from 200 to 1000 Hz, thresholds were higher for condition C than for conditions U or S (i.e., a CDD occurred), but for thresholds for condition C also reached absolute threshold. In experiment 2, was fixed at 600 Hz and conditions were included where only the upper or the lower masker band was correlated with the signal band. Also, the overall level of the masker was systematically varied. The results indicate that the magnitude of CDD is determined by the comodulation of the signal band with the masker band producing the most masking. Overall, the results support an explanation based on the spread of excitation and dip listening, rather than an explanation based on perceptual grouping.
Keywords
This publication has 44 references indexed in Scilit:
- Frequency selectivity as a function of level and frequency measured with uniformly exciting notched noiseThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2000
- Modeling auditory processing of amplitude modulation. I. Detection and masking with narrow-band carriersThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1997
- Stimulus-driven, time-varying weights for comodulation masking releaseThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1996
- Profile analysis and comodulation detection differences using narrow bands of noise and their relation to comodulation masking releaseThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1994
- Auditory grouping based on fundamental frequency and formant peak frequency.Canadian Journal of Psychology / Revue canadienne de psychologie, 1990
- Derivation of auditory filter shapes from notched-noise dataHearing Research, 1990
- Comodulation masking release for three types of modulator as a function of modulation rateHearing Research, 1989
- The effect of cross-spectrum correlation on the detectability of a noise bandThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1987
- Release from masking caused by envelope fluctuationsThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1985
- On the Masking Pattern of a Simple Auditory StimulusThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1950