Prediction of sudden infant death syndrome: An independent evaluation of four scoring methods
- 1 March 1986
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Statistics in Medicine
- Vol. 5 (2) , 113-126
- https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.4780050203
Abstract
The performances of four published risk prediction systems for sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) were compared for the 34 cases of SIDS and 48 explained deaths among a cohort of all births in the U.K. during one week in April 1970. With cut-points for the scores which would include about 20 per cent of the population, the sensitivities of the scoring methods ranged from identifying 40 per cent of the explained deaths to 70 per cent of SIDS. The highest sensitivities were achieved with the Sheffield 'at birth' system and a system based on both data from Oxford and general observations from the literature, with the latter system providing the most powerful predictor of SIDS for the study sample.Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- Assessing Risk AssessmentPublished by Springer Nature ,1985
- PREVENTION OF UNEXPECTED INFANT DEATH Evaluation of the First Seven Years of the Sheffield Intervention ProgrammeThe Lancet, 1983
- Sudden infant death in Southampton and an evaluation of the Sheffield scoring systemJournal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 1982
- The epidemiology of sudden infant death syndromeJournal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 1982
- Sudden Infant Death Syndrome Risk FactorsClinical Pediatrics, 1979
- Evaluation of the Sheffield system for identifying children at risk from unexpected death in infancy. Results from Birmingham and Newcastle upon Tyne.Archives of Disease in Childhood, 1978
- Multistage scoring system for identifying infants at risk of unexpected death.Archives of Disease in Childhood, 1977