Histamine2-Receptor Antagonists
- 20 December 1990
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Massachusetts Medical Society in New England Journal of Medicine
- Vol. 323 (25) , 1749-1755
- https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199012203232507
Abstract
H2 Blockers in Peptic Ulcer DiseaseDuodenal UlcerAll four H2 blockers, when used in the doses shown in Table 1, are capable of healing duodenal ulcer to approximately the same degree.203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 The average rates of healing with H2 blockers in several placebo-controlled studies among outpatients are shown in Figure 3. The rates of complete healing after two, four, and eight weeks of therapy averaged 51, 78, and 92 percent, all substantially higher than the rates of healing with placebo. It is apparent from Figure 3 that the healing curve for duodenal ulcer may not have reached a plateau after . . .Keywords
This publication has 74 references indexed in Scilit:
- Regression of Barrett's Epithelium with OmeprazoleNew England Journal of Medicine, 1989
- A Randomized Study of Maintenance Therapy with Ranitidine to Prevent the Recurrence of Duodenal UlcerNew England Journal of Medicine, 1989
- Effect of Omeprazole and Ranitidine on Ulcer Healing and Relapse Rates in Patients with Benign Gastric UlcerNew England Journal of Medicine, 1989
- Nosocomial Pneumonia in Intubated Patients Given Sucralfate as Compared with Antacids or Histamine Type 2 BlockersNew England Journal of Medicine, 1987
- Ranitidine therapy for gastroesophageal reflux disease. Results of a large double-blind trialArchives of internal medicine (1960), 1987
- Symptomatic cimetidine treatment of duodenal and prepyloric ulcersDigestive Diseases and Sciences, 1986
- Treatment with Histamine H2Antagonists in Acute Upper Gastrointestinal HemorrhageNew England Journal of Medicine, 1985
- Ranitidine in Reflux OesophagitisDigestion, 1984
- Controlled trial of cimetidine in reflux esophagitisDigestive Diseases and Sciences, 1980
- Antacid versus Cimetidine in Preventing Acute Gastrointestinal BleedingNew England Journal of Medicine, 1980