HEPATIC LIDOCAINE METABOLISM AND COMPLICATIONS OF CIRRHOSIS IMPLICATIONS FOR ASSESSING PATIENT PRIORITY FOR HEPATIC TRANSPLANTATION
- 1 April 1993
- journal article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Transplantation
- Vol. 55 (4) , 830-834
- https://doi.org/10.1097/00007890-199304000-00028
Abstract
The number of patients awaiting hepatic transplantation continues to exceed organ donation. As a result, many liver transplant candidates will develop life-threatening complications of their liver disease and not survive the pretransplant waiting period. Recent studies have demonstrated that hepatic lidocaine metabolism into monoethylglycinexylidide (MEG-X) can predict pretransplant survival. The present study was performed to determine if MEG-X could also predict pretransplant complications and thereby be useful in stratifying persons being evaluated for hepatic transplantation. A total of 57 patients with biopsy-proven cirrhosis underwent MEG-X testing. Of 57 patients, 30 (53%) developed life-threatening complications of their liver disease--i.e., variceal bleeding, grade II hepatic encephalopathy or worse, and spontaneous bacterial peritonitis. MEG-X values were greater in persons without complications of liver disease than in persons with complications (25.7 +/- 2.9 versus 14.7 +/- 1.4 ng/ml, respectively). No patients with MEG-X greater than 30 ng/ml developed a major complication. No significant difference in any of the standard liver function tests existed between persons who developed complications and patients who did not. In this group of 57 patients, 4 (7%) died from complications of cirrhosis. Mean MEG-X for patients who died (5.5 +/- 1.6 ng/ml) was significantly less (P < 0.05) than observed for other patient groups. All patients who died had MEG-X values below 10 ng/ml. This suggests that MEG-X testing could be an extremely useful test in the evaluation of patients for hepatic transplantation by identifying persons at increased risk for developing complications of chronic liver disease.Keywords
This publication has 0 references indexed in Scilit: