Getting the Measure of Emotion - and the Cautionary Tale of Emotional Intelligence
- 1 June 2004
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Human Relations
- Vol. 57 (6) , 719-740
- https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726704044953
Abstract
This article examines critically the recent growth of emotion measurement in organizational behaviour. The epistemological and phenomenological consequences of psychometrically ‘boxing’ emotion are, it is argued, problematic and restrictive. This may be seen in the power and professional prestige it affords to the measurers and in the consequences to those classified by measurement. This is particularly so when an emotion is presented as key to personal or organizational success. Emotional intelligence is a strong illustration of these issues, where ‘experts’ ascribe positive value to people with high emotional intelligence quotients (EQ), and low EQs are regarded as suitable cases for training. How can emotion be ‘known’, other than through measurement and numbers? The article suggests some different approaches towards researching an important, but enigmatic, concept.Keywords
This publication has 44 references indexed in Scilit:
- Is Emotional Intelligene a Viable Concept?Academy of Management Review, 2003
- Emotion, Decision Making and the Orbitofrontal CortexCerebral Cortex, 2000
- Emotional intelligence meets traditional standards for an intelligencePublished by Elsevier ,2000
- Knowledge for what? The intellectual consequences of the Research Assessment ExerciseHistory of the Human Sciences, 1999
- Emotion in Organizations: Main CurrentsHuman Relations, 1999
- Research Methods in Cognition and EmotionPublished by Wiley ,1999
- Organizational StorytellingManagement Learning, 1994
- The measurement of emotional reactions to work: Conceptual, methodological and research issuesWork & Stress, 1994
- Why Triangulate?Educational Researcher, 1988
- Cognitive, social, and physiological determinants of emotional state.Psychological Review, 1962