Grading of brain tumours. The British experience
- 1 March 1992
- journal article
- Published by Springer Nature in Neurosurgical Review
- Vol. 15 (1) , 7-11
- https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02352059
Abstract
In order to ascertain how widely the Kernohan and WHO numerical grading systems for brain tumours are used in Britain and how uniformly they are applied, a questionnaire was circulated to named neuropathologists in 19 Regional Neuropathology Centres in Britain. Eighty four per cent replied within 10 days. Their replies showed considerable variation in the use of grading systems and revealed that numerical grading was required mainly by clinicians and was not necessarily favoured by pathologists. Although some advantages of a grading system were advanced, it does seem that numerical grading of brain tumours is ill-defined and controversial. Furthermore, the use of historical grading systems may inhibit the incorporation of advances in pathological investigation into the clinical management of patients with brain tumours.Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- Cell proliferation patterns in the diagnosis of astrocytomas, anaplastic astrocytomas and glioblastoma multiforme: a Ki‐67 studyNeuropathology and Applied Neurobiology, 1990
- INAUGURAL DOROTHYS. RUSSELL MEMORIAL LECTURE*Neuropathology and Applied Neurobiology, 1986
- Oligodendroglioma. Histologic Evaluation and PrognosisJournal of Neuropathology and Experimental Neurology, 1986
- Glioblastoma multiforme and anaplastic astrocytoma pathologic criteria and prognostic implicationsCancer, 1985
- Cell cycle analysis of a cell proliferation-associated human nuclear antigen defined by the monoclonal antibody Ki-67.The Journal of Immunology, 1984
- THE CEREBELLAR MEDULLOBLASTOMA AND ITS RELATIONSHIP TO PRIMITIVE NEUROECTODERMAL TUMORS1983
- PRESIDENTIAL ADDRESSJournal of Neuropathology and Experimental Neurology, 1983