Trapping the flies that cause myiasis: their responses to host-stimuli
- 1 August 1995
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Pathogens and Global Health
- Vol. 89 (4) , 333-357
- https://doi.org/10.1080/00034983.1995.11812964
Abstract
A critical phase in the life cycle of the fly species that cause myiasis is host location by the adult females, whether by direct location of and contact with the host, or by indirect location through the selection of sites frequented by hosts. The stimuli to which these flies respond in host location, principally visual and olfactory, are discussed here in the context of their use to enhance the performance of trapping systems used in research, monitoring and control. The three major families of flies encountered in myiasis can be divided into two groups for comparison of host-location strategies: (1) Oestridae; and (2) Calliphoridae and Sacrophagidae. The former are all obligate parasites, the latter include obligate and primary facultative parasites. In the Oestridae, the majority of Cuterebrinae deposit their eggs at sites likely to be visited by the host, whereas the majority of Oestrinae, Hypodermatinae and Gasterophilinae deposit their eggs or larvae directly onto the host. It is presumed that most host location is, like that of haematophagous insects, by response to olfactory and visual cues released by healthy hosts, but the subject is very under-researched. In the Calliphoridae and Sacrophagidae, most species that cause myiasis deposit their eggs or larvae directly onto the host at some predisposing site, such as those caused by wounding, necrosis and/or bacterial contamination. Healthy hosts are much less attractive, even for obligate species such as Wohlfahrtia magnified, which can invade undamaged tissues. The last decade has seen a renewed interest in the potential for using traps in control of myiasis, leading to significant advances in trap and bait efficiency. However, there is great potential for füther research and development, particularly on the general responses of Oestridae to hosts and in the precise identification of the olfactory cues for Calliphoridae and Sarcophagidae.Keywords
This publication has 95 references indexed in Scilit:
- Predicting the abundance of the blowflyLucilia sericata(Diptera: Calliphoridae)Bulletin of Entomological Research, 1993
- Intra- and interspecific sex pheromone responses of screwworm and secondary screwworm fliesJournal of Chemical Ecology, 1992
- Responses of female New World screwworm flies, Cochliomyia hominivorax, to coloured targets in the laboratoryMedical and Veterinary Entomology, 1992
- Development of an attractive target for the sheep blowfly Lucilia sericataMedical and Veterinary Entomology, 1992
- Control of tsetse flies and trypanosomiasis: Myth or reality?Parasitology Today, 1991
- Morphology of the eggs of the rhinoceros bot flies Gyrostigma conjungens and G. pavesii (Diptera : Gasterophilidae)International Journal of Insect Morphology and Embryology, 1990
- The chemical control of livestock parasites: Problems and alternativesParasitology Today, 1990
- Upwind flight by gravid australian sheep blowflies,Lucilia cuprina(Wiedemann) (Diptera: Calliphoridae), in response to stimuli from sheepBulletin of Entomological Research, 1988
- Responses of gravid screwworm flies,Cochliomyia hominivorax, to whole wounds, wound fluid, and a standard blood attractant in olfactometer testsJournal of Chemical Ecology, 1983
- The reactions of blowflies to organic sulphur compounds and other materials used in trapsParasitology, 1950