Let Them Eat Cake: A Note on Comparing Alternative Models of the Demand for Medical Care
- 1 July 1984
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of Business & Economic Statistics
- Vol. 2 (3) , 279-282
- https://doi.org/10.1080/07350015.1984.10509395
Abstract
This article comments on the Rand econometric approach to estimating and testing models of the demand for medical care as typified in Duan et al. (1983). The Rand methodology is contrasted with more mainstream econometric approaches to similar empirical problems as developed in the sample selection literature. It is shown that despite Rand's claim, their approach requires some fairly unusual assumptions on the model joint error distribution and functional form. Alternatively, their model likelihood functions may be interpreted as being nested in more general sample selection model likelihood functions with easily testable parameter restrictions.Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- A Comparison of Alternative Models for the Demand for Medical CareJournal of Business & Economic Statistics, 1983
- Limited-dependent and qualitative variables in econometricsPublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,1983
- Distributional Tests for Selectivity Bias and a More Robust Likelihood EstimatorInternational Economic Review, 1982
- Some Interim Results from a Controlled Trial of Cost Sharing in Health InsuranceNew England Journal of Medicine, 1981
- A Least Squares Correction for Selectivity BiasEconometrica, 1980
- On having your cake and eating it too: Econometric problems in estimating the demand for health servicesJournal of Econometrics, 1980
- Some Statistical Models for Limited Dependent Variables with Application to the Demand for Durable GoodsEconometrica, 1971