RELATIVE USEFULNESS OF PHYSICAL-EXAMINATION, URODYNAMICS AND ROENTGENOGRAPHY IN THE DIAGNOSIS OF URINARY STRESS-INCONTINENCE
- 1 July 1988
- journal article
- research article
- Vol. 167 (1) , 39-44
Abstract
Stress urinary incontinence is a common problem in women. Accurate diagnosis of this condition is necessary for successful surgical treatment. Currently, many tests are popular. The relative value of these tests, in terms of usefulness, accuracy and practicality, has not been tested in the past. With this aim, we have compared the results from three of the most commonly performed tests, namely physical examination, urodynamics and roentgenography. It is our opinion that physical examination in the standing position is the simplest and most accurate test. Cystometrogram is important, although the yield is small. We do not advise the routine use of urethral pressure profile. For accurate determination of anatomic deformity, roentgenographic examination is the most accurate test.This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- Evaluation of reliability of history in women complaining of urinary stress incontinenceEuropean Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 1986
- Microtransducer Urethral Profile Methodology: Variations Caused by Transducer OrientationJournal of Urology, 1983
- URODYNAMICS IN WOMEN WITH STRESS URINARY-INCONTINENCE1982
- DETECTION OF URINARY INCONTINENCEBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1981
- GENUINE STRESS INCONTINENCE AND DETRUSOR INSTABILITY—A REVIEW OF 200 PATIENTSBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1980
- Urethral Pressure Profile in Female Stress IncontinenceJournal of Urology, 1978
- INTRAURETHRAL AND INTRAVESICAL PRESSURES IN NORMAL AND STRESS-INCONTINENT WOMEN1967