INTRAVITREAL INJECTION OF 2.5 mg VERSUS 1.25 mg BEVACIZUMAB (AVASTIN) FOR TREATMENT OF CNV ASSOCIATED WITH AMD

Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
To compare the safety and efficacy of intravitreal injections of 1.25 and 2.5 mg bevacizumab for treatment of choroidal neovascularization associated with age-related macular degeneration. In this prospective, randomized, comparative clinical trial, 86 patients with active choroidal neovascularization associated with age-related macular degeneration were studied. Baseline best-corrected visual acuity in the study eye was from 20/40 to 20/2000. Patients were randomly assigned to receive intravitreal injections of 2.5 (39 patients) or 1.25 mg (47 patients) of intravitreal bevacizumab. Best-corrected visual acuity measurement and clinical ocular examination were performed at 1 week, 1 month and then monthly for 5 months. Fluorescein angiography and optical coherence tomography were performed at 1 month and 3 months after each injection. The mean change in best-corrected visual acuity was -0.06 +/- 0.3 logMAR in 1.25 mg and -0.07 +/- 0.34 in 2.5 mg groups in 3 months (P = 0.9) and -0.06 +/- 0.27 logMAR in 1.25 mg and -0.09 +/- 0.28 in 2.5 mg groups in 5 months (P = 0.6). There was no significant difference in visual acuity between the two groups at any time point during the study. The mean change in foveal thickness was -49 +/- 36 micro in 1.25 mg and -65 +/- 31 micro in 2.5 mg group (P = 0.6). In 2.5 mg group, three cases of vitreous reaction and one case of massive subretinal hemorrhage were observed. Intravitreal injection of 2.5 mg bevacizumab has the same efficacy as 1.25 mg, but may be associated with a higher rate of adverse events.