The effects of race and social class on clinical judgment
- 1 April 1980
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Clinical Psychology
- Vol. 36 (2) , 605-609
- https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.6120360238
Abstract
Asked 61 male clinical psychologists (21 blacks and 40 whites) to assess case histories that were presented to them to determine whether racial or social class biases could be detected. In order to avoid the apparent artificial results or weak interpretations of past research, only cases with concurrently validated diagnoses and 4-year follow-up were used. An equal number of positive and negative clinical outcomes were included. Diagnosis, disposition, and rated severity were studied. The following results were found: (1) diagnosis for all psychologists was guided by case characteristics, not bias; (2) severity was related strongly to diagnosis; (3) disposition followed judgments of severity and diagnosis, not bias. The question was raised whether clinical investigators may not have overdramatized bias in psychodiagnosis and clinical judgment.This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- Differential diagnosis imbalance as a race-related phenomenonJournal of Clinical Psychology, 1975
- Negro vs Caucasian psychological test performance revisited.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1974
- Race-related and educationally-related MMPI profile differences among hospitalized schizophrenicsJournal of Clinical Psychology, 1973
- Noblesse oblige effect: The interpretation of Rorschach responses as a function of ascribed social class.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1972
- Comparative psychological studies of Negroes and Whites in the United States: 1959-1965.Psychological Bulletin, 1968
- Social Class and Psychiatric TreatmentArchives of General Psychiatry, 1960