EVOLUTIONARY THEORIES OF MORALITY AND THE MANIPULATIVE USE OF SIGNALS
- 1 March 1994
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Open Library of the Humanities in Zygon: Journal of Religion and Science
- Vol. 29 (1) , 81-101
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9744.1994.tb00651.x
Abstract
Several attempts have recently been made to explain moral systems and moral sentiments in light of evolutionary biological theory. It may be helpful to modify and extend this project with the help of a theory of communication developed by ethologists. The core of this approach is the idea that signals are best seen as attempts to manipulate others rather than as attempts to inform them. This addition helps to clarify some problematic areas in the evolutionary study of morals, and it generates new, testable predictions about moral statements.Keywords
This publication has 61 references indexed in Scilit:
- Group selection among alternative evolutionarily stable strategiesPublished by Elsevier ,2006
- Biological signals as handicapsPublished by Elsevier ,2006
- The cost of honesty: Further Remarks on the Handicap PrinciplePublished by Elsevier ,2006
- Mate selection—A selection for a handicapPublished by Elsevier ,2004
- The Cultural Evolution of Beneficent NormsSocial Forces, 1992
- The continuous Sir Philip Sidney game: A simple model of biological signallingJournal of Theoretical Biology, 1992
- Sexual selection unhandicapped by the fisher processJournal of Theoretical Biology, 1990
- The evolution of reciprocity in sizable groupsJournal of Theoretical Biology, 1988
- Human sociobiologyAmerican Journal of Physical Anthropology, 1987
- The genetical evolution of social behaviour. IJournal of Theoretical Biology, 1964